2 - 2. Cleaning
When polymer is scarce in quantity and distributed in the form of thin
film, oxidizing reactions of UV/Ozone proceed to inside and polymers ultimately
decompose to molecules of CO2, H2O, O2, N2 and so on.
They are evaporated and scattered, disappearing from the surface.
This reaction causes the cleaning effects.
Therefore, the UV/Ozone method can get rid of the organic compound, namely oily pollution, but is not effective to inorganic dust or the like.
This cleaning effect is characteristic in its extremely high cleanliness far above the wet cleaning methods as shown in Table 3.
Table 3.Comparison of the cleaning powers among the various cleaning methods
| Cleaning conditions | Contact angle (degree) |
| Non-treated glass plate | 26 |
| Synthetic detergent(US) |
39 |
| Synthetic detergent(US) |
17 |
| Synthetic detergent(US) |
13 |
| Ozone solution | <10 |
| Synthetic detergent(US) |
5 |
| Synthetic detergent(US) |
4 |
Note 1, Plasma: 200W, 1torr, 5sec, 13.56MHz
Note 2, UV/O3:Low pressure mercury lamp , Atmosphere, 60sec
Note 3, (US): Ultra sonic (Vap): Steam washing(70°C): Air dry
It is as capable as the plasma method.
By just that much it is weak against any massive pollution. In order to
make the best of the cleaning effect of the UV/Ozone method, it is essential
for you to remove large amount of stains first beforehand by some other
cleaning method.
Hydrocarbon solvents have a strong cleaning power, but Table 3 shows a
large contact angle on the contrary.
This means that the solvents remain on the surface.
In precision cleaning it is important to rinse with pure water at the last
stage of cleaning.
The UV/Ozone process is free from any such residual problems.
2 - 3. Light Source
In order to break optically the molecular bonds of organic compounds, it is an essential precondition that light is absorbed by the compounds and its energy is larger than the molecular bond energy.
table4.bond energy of molecules(unit :kj/mol)
| Bondage | Molecule(AB) | Molecule(A;B) | Bond energy |
| H-H | H2 | 2H | 432.07 |
| H-C | C6H6 CH4 CH3 CH |
H, CHO H, CH3 H, CH2 H, C |
464 431.8 457 334.7 |
| O-C | CO2 CH3OH |
CO, O CH3, OH |
526.1 378.1 |
| N-N | N2 N2O4 |
2N 2NO2 |
941.6 53 |
| O-O | O2 O2+ O3 H2O2 |
2O O, O+ O, O2 2OH |
493.6 642.8 102 206.8 |
| C-F | CH3F C6H5F |
CH3, F C6H5, F |
472 524 |
| Cl-Cl | Cl2 | 2Cl | 239.2 |
| H-O | H2O H2O OH |
2H, O H, OH O, H |
[458.9] 493.4 424.4 |
Table 4 shows the bond energy of plastics, while Table 5 shows the spectroscopic energy of low-pressure mercury lamp, xe-excimer lamp and high-pressure mercury lamp.
Table 5.Wavelength of lamps and its energy
| Low pressure mercury lamp |
Xe excimer lamp | High pressure mercury lamp |
|||
| Wavelength (nm) | 185 | 254 | 172 | 365 | |
| Energy | (kJ/mol) | 647 | 472 | 696 | 328 |
| (eV) | 6.7 | 4.9 | 7.2 | 3.4 | |
Table 6 shows the relation among the UV wavelength range, wavelength and
energy.
With regard to the electromagnetic wave of light and so on, the shorter
wavelength, the higher energy.
Table 6.Wavelength range and division of UV
| Xray | UV(Ultraviolet dadiation) | Visiblelight | Infra- redradiation |
|||
| UV-C | B | UV-A | ||||
| ă(nm) | 100 280 315 400 780 | |||||
| energy | ||||||
| (kJ/mol) | 1196 427 380 299 153 | |||||
| (eV) | 12.4 2.9 3.3 3.1 1.6 | |||||
The energy of low-pressure mercury lamp (185nm and 254nm) and xenon excimer
lamp (172nm) is as high as or higher than the bond energy of organic compounds
shown in Table 4.
This is the first reason that these lamps are suitable for surface modification.
The second reason is that they are well structured to facilitate formation of a surface light source.
As for the typical wavelength of high-pressure mercury lamp (365nm), its energy is as low as 328kJ/mol, not suitable for surface treatment. Infra-red radiation cannot be used for surface modification either.
| back | next |